Too many inactive members 29 January 2014 Reviewer: Andrew from Los Angeles
622 of 868 people found this review helpful
Chances of Getting a Date:
Features:
Quality / Size of Members' Photos:
Help Files / Technical Support:
Ease of Use / Navigation:
Ease of Joining / Registration:
Value for Money:
Overall Star Rating:
I am a male living in Los Angeles. I signed up for adultfriendfinder and paid for a 1 month Gold membership. I filled out my profile and uploaded pics. After being approved I then did a search for "members near me", ages 19-41. Based on AFF's membership in the tens of millions I expected see (and hopefully meet) dozens of horny women. Here are the actual results ...
Within an appropriate distance for Los Angeles due to traffic, it showed 31 female members. Not bad. Not bad at all. Upon closer examination only 2 of these 31 female members had logged in within 1 week. The other 29 showed as not having logged in for several weeks or even several months, obviously inactive.
What good is slogging through pages of inactive members to find a couple of possibilities? Obviously, AFF does not "dump" ANY of their inactive members. And they don't have a search parameter for "last time member logged in) i.e. 1 day, 3 days, 1 week etc. so you can't avoid all the inactives. Thus, paying members are paying to mainly see tons of totally inactive members!
Adultfriendfinder? A total waste of time. And money.
In summary, I would not recommend Adult Friend Finder to a friend.
